Scene Barrier Effects on Vehicle Deceleration Rate during Primary Accident in a Suburban Area

M. F. H. Rani, S. Abu Bakar, M. S. M. Hashim, A. Harun, Z. M. Razlan, W. K. Wan, I. Zunaidi, I. Ibrahim, M. Afendi, N. E. Efi, Y. Ahmad, M. Dalib and S. S. Mat Rudin

Abstract: This study uses a simulation of primary accident to investigate the scene barrier effects on vehicle deceleration rate in the suburban area to assess driver behaviour. Several conditions were designed and experimented to determine the capability of scene barrier, which included free flow traffic without an accident, an accident without scene barrier and an accident with scene barrier. The vehicle deceleration rate was investigated by collecting speed-time data in normal traffic zone and rubbernecking zone. Results found that the average vehicle deceleration rate reached as high as – 1.93 km/h/s in rubbernecking zone compared to normal traffic zone (as high as – 0.49 km/h/s) especially when an accident was simulated without the scene barrier. Introduction of scene barrier during the simulated accident improved traffic flow and reduced rubbernecking phenomena by improving the average vehicle deceleration rate in rubbernecking zone by up to 43.0 %. However, sudden deceleration cannot be totally eliminated during the simulated accident with the scene barrier due to driver behaviour. For optimization of braking time during a primary accident, a study of the algorithm of Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) system is necessary.

Keywords:Road accidents, rubbernecking, driver’s behaviour, vehicles deceleration rate, traffic congestion


Chen, D., Laval, J., Zheng, Z., & Ahn, S. (2012). A behavioral car-following model that captures traffic oscillations. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 46(6), 744-761.

Chung, Y., & Recker, W.W. (2013). Spatiotemporal analysis of traffic congestion caused by rubbernecking at freeway accidents. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 14(3), 1416-1422.

Colon, N.P., Rupp, M.A., & Mouloua, M. (2013). Temporary barriers to reduce the effects of rubbernecking. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1810-1814.

Galgamuwa, U., Perera, L., & Bandara, S. (2015). Developing a general methodology for driving cycle construction: Comparison of various established driving cycles in the world to propose a general approach. Journal of Transportation Technologies, 5(4), 191-203.

Gallagher, P. (2015). Screens used to stop motorists peering into crash sites deployed just 77 times in recent years – despite £2.2m being spent on them | The Independent. Retrieved 24 June 2018, from peering-into-crash-sites-deployed-just-77-times-in-recent-years-10462893.html

Masinick, J., Teng, H., & Orochena, N. (2014). The impact of rubbernecking on urban freeway traffic. Journal of Transportation Technologies, 4(1), 116-125.

Ministry of Transport (2017). Transport Statistics Malaysia 2016 (Statistik Pengangkutan Jalan 2016). Putrajaya: Ministry of Transport Malaysia.

Murphy, P. (2017). The Two Second Rule | Australind Driving School. Retrieved 28 June 2018, from

Park, H., & Haghani, A. (2016). Stochastic capacity adjustment considering secondary incidents. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17(10), 2843-2853.

Snelder, M., Bakri, T., & van Arem, B. (2013). Delays caused by incidents. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2333, 1-8. 01

Tutuianu, M., Bonnel, P., Ciuffo, B., Haniu, T., Ichikawa, N., Marotta, A., Pavlovic, J., & Steven, H. (2015). Development of the world-wide harmonized Light duty Test Cycle (WLTC) and a possible pathway for its introduction in the European legislation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 40, 61-75.

Tutuianu, M., Marotta, A., Steven, H., Ericsson, E., Haniu, T., Ichikawa, N., & Ishii, H. (2014). Development of a worldwide harmonized Light duty driving Test Cycle. Technical Report.