Comparative Analysis of Motorcycle Braking Performance in Emergency Situation

A. H. Ariffin, A. Hamzah, M. S. Solah, N. F. Paiman, Z. Mohd Jawi and M. H. Md Isa

Abstract: This study was conducted to assess motorcycle braking performance in simulated emergency situation. Braking distances and G- force values (peak) during the braking test of 6 distinct underbone motorcycles of 100-150cc were measured and compared based on different test conditions namely type of brake system (disc and drum), method of braking operation (front and rear brakes) and test load (rider only and rider with pillion). The results indicate that type of braking system and method of braking operation significantly influenced braking distance and G-force value. However, test load was found insignificant. The shortest braking distance and highest deceleration rate were 12.48 meters and 8.52 m/s2, respectively. The lowest G-force value (peak) was recorded 0.39 throughout the test. It is to be noted that this study is unique on its own due to certain limitations although some of the methods were adopted from the established international braking test standards. Even though this study is considered fundamental, the findings could provide vital information on the braking performance of underbone motorcycles especially to the motorcycle manufacturers and OEMs, as well as to the relevant authorities (driving institutes and Road Transport Department).

Keywords:Braking performance, braking distance, underbone motorcycles, low engine capacity motorcycles


ACEM (2004). MAIDS in-depth investigations of accidents involving powered two-wheelers. Final report. Brussels: European Association of Motorcycle Manufacturers.

DfT (2010). Reported road casualties Great Britain: 2009. Annual report. London, UK: Department for Transport. Retrieved from

Hurt, H.H., Ouellet, J.V., & Thom, D.R. (1981). Motorcycle accident cause factors and identification of countermeasures Volume I: Technical report (DOT-HS-805-862). California, US: Traffic Safety Center, University of Southern California.

Hussain, H., Radin, U.R.S., Ahmad, F.M.S., & Dadang, M.M. (2005). Key components of a motorcycle- traffic system: A study along the motorcycle path in Malaysia. IATSS Research, 29(1), 50-56.

IIHS (n.d.). Q & As. Motorcycles. General. Virginia, US: Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. Retrieved from–general

John El, K., & Antoine, G.H. (2007). Assessing the risk in the design of passing sight distances. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 133, 370-377.

Kasantikul, V. (2002). Motorcycle accident cause factors and identification of countermeasures in Thailand. Volume I: Bangkok study. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.

Muhammad Marizwan A.M., & Várhelyi, A. (2012). Motorcycle fatalities in Malaysia. IATSS Research, 36, 30-39.

NHTSA (2007). Traffic safety facts 2005. Washington, DC, US: National Center for Statistics and Analysis, U.S. Department of Transportation.

NHTSA (2013). Laboratory test procedure for FMVSS 122, motorcycle brake systems (TP-122-03). Washington, DC, US: U.S. Department of Transportation.

RMP (2009). Laporan tahunan PDRM 2009 (Royal Malaysia Police annual report, 2009). Kuala Lumpur: Royal Malaysia Police.

Roslan, A., Sarani, R., Hashim, H.H., & Saniran, N. (2011). Motorcycle ADSA fact sheet, vol. 2. Kajang: Malaysian Instiute of Road Safety Research. Retrieved from

RTD (n.d.). Jumlah pendaftaran motosikal mengikut tahun (Motorcycle registration number by year). Putrajaya: Road Transport Department Malaysia. Retrieved from

RTD (2009). Statistik pendaftaran kenderaan motosikal mengikut buatan, kuasa enjin bagi tahun 2000- 2008 (Motorcycle registration statistics by make and engine capacity for year 2000-2008). Putrajaya: Road Transport Department Malaysia.

RTD (2014). Kurikulum pendidikan pemandu, buku teks modul motosikal (Driver education curriculum, motorcycle module textbook). Putrajaya: Road Transport Department Malaysia.

Shankar, U. (2001). Fatal single vehicle motorcycle crashes. Technical report (DOT-HS-809-360). Virginia, US: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Teoh, E.R. (2009). Effectiveness of antilock braking systems in reducing fatal motorcycle crashes. Virginia, US: Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.

UN Vehicle Regulation No. 78, Agreement. (2007). Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles of categories L1, L2, L3, L4 and L5 with regard to braking (E/ECE/TRANS/505, Rev. 1/Add.77/Rev. 1). Geneva: United Nations.